Ryzen 9 7845HX vs Atom D2550
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 9 7845HX outperforms Atom D2550 by a whopping 11013% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3404 | 241 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Atom | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.97 | 19.64 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Cedarview (2011−2012) | Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 1 November 2011 (13 years ago) | 4 January 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Atom D2550 and Ryzen 9 7845HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 1.86 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.87 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | CCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm |
| Die size | 66 mm2 | 2x 71 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 176 million | 13,140 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Atom D2550 and Ryzen 9 7845HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA559 | FL1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom D2550 and Ryzen 9 7845HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom D2550 and Ryzen 9 7845HX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | - | no data |
| VT-x | - | no data |
| VT-i | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom D2550 and Ryzen 9 7845HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 (640 MHz) | AMD Radeon 610M (400 - 2200 MHz) |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Atom D2550 and Ryzen 9 7845HX integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom D2550 and Ryzen 9 7845HX.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 4 | 28 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.23 | 25.56 |
| Recency | 1 November 2011 | 4 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 12 |
| Threads | 4 | 24 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 55 Watt |
Atom D2550 has 450% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 9 7845HX, on the other hand, has a 11013% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads.
The AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom D2550 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
