Ultra 9 285K vs Atom D2550

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom D2550 and Core Ultra 9 285K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated54
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data68.51
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiencyno data31.91
Architecture codenameCedarview (2011−2012)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date1 November 2011 (13 years ago)24 October 2024 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$589

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom D2550 and Core Ultra 9 285K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads424
Base clock speed1.86 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.87 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus rateno data250 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm3 nm
Die size66 mm2243 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors176 million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom D2550 and Core Ultra 9 285K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA5591851
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom D2550 and Core Ultra 9 285K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Atom D2550 and Core Ultra 9 285K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom D2550 and Core Ultra 9 285K are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+
VT-i-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom D2550 and Core Ultra 9 285K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5 Depends on motherboard
Maximum memory size4 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650Arc Xe-2 Graphics 64EU

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom D2550 and Core Ultra 9 285K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom D2550 and Core Ultra 9 285K.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanes420

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom D2550 409
Ultra 9 285K 66951
+16269%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2011 24 October 2024
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 4 24
Chip lithography 32 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 125 Watt

Atom D2550 has 1150% lower power consumption.

Ultra 9 285K, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, 1100% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 966.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom D2550 and Core Ultra 9 285K. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom D2550 is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 9 285K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom D2550 and Core Ultra 9 285K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom D2550
Atom D2550
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Core Ultra 9 285K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 36 votes

Rate Atom D2550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 74 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom D2550 or Core Ultra 9 285K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.