Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE vs Atom D2550
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3439 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Atom | no data |
| Power efficiency | 2.47 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Cedarview (2011−2012) | Windsor (2006−2007) |
| Release date | 1 November 2011 (14 years ago) | August 2007 (18 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Atom D2550 and Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.86 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.87 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 66 mm2 | 230 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 176 million | 227 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Atom D2550 and Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA559 | AM2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom D2550 and Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom D2550 and Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | no data |
| VT-x | - | no data |
| VT-i | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom D2550 and Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 (640 MHz) | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Atom D2550 and Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom D2550 and Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE.
| PCI Express lanes | 4 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 125 Watt |
Atom D2550 has 100% more threads, a 181.3% more advanced lithography process, and 1150% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Atom D2550 and AMD Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Atom D2550 is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
