Athlon Silver 3050U vs Atom D2500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

Atom D2500
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.14
Athlon Silver 3050U
2020
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
1.67
+1093%

Athlon Silver 3050U outperforms Atom D2500 by a whopping 1093% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking35912274
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
Power efficiency1.5011.95
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameCedarview (2011−2012)Dali (Zen) (2020)
Release date1 November 2011 (14 years ago)6 January 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Atom D2500 and Athlon Silver 3050U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.86 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.87 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplierno data23
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size66 mm2148 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
Number of transistors176 million3,500 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom D2500 and Athlon Silver 3050U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA559FP5
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom D2500 and Athlon Silver 3050U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
AMT-no data
HD Audio+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Atom D2500 and Athlon Silver 3050U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom D2500 and Athlon Silver 3050U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom D2500 and Athlon Silver 3050U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size4 GB32 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel GMAAMD Radeon RX Vega 2 ( - 1100 MHz)

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom D2500 and Athlon Silver 3050U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom D2500 and Athlon Silver 3050U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanes412
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Atom D2500 0.14
Athlon Silver 3050U 1.67
+1093%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Atom D2500 251
Samples: 40
Athlon Silver 3050U 2952
+1076%
Samples: 602

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.14 1.67
Recency 1 November 2011 6 January 2020
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 15 Watt

Atom D2500 has 50% lower power consumption.

Athlon Silver 3050U, on the other hand, has a 1092.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD Athlon Silver 3050U is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom D2500 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom D2500
Atom D2500
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U
Athlon Silver 3050U

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 39 votes

Rate Atom D2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 8201 votes

Rate Athlon Silver 3050U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom D2500 and Athlon Silver 3050U, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.