Celeron 4305UE vs Atom C3958

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom C3958
2017, $449
16 cores / 16 threads, 31 Watt
2.24
+131%
Celeron 4305UE
2018, $107
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.97

Atom C3958 outperforms Celeron 4305UE by a whopping 131% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20662747
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.170.80
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiency3.052.73
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)
Release date15 August 2017 (8 years ago)1 October 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron 4305UE has 371% better value for money than Atom C3958.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Atom C3958 and Celeron 4305UE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache896 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache16 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature83 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3958 and Celeron 4305UE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1310Intel BGA 1528
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3958 and Celeron 4305UE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssist+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data

Security technologies

Atom C3958 and Celeron 4305UE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3958 and Celeron 4305UE are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3958 and Celeron 4305UE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2400DDR4
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 610

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3958 and Celeron 4305UE.

PCIe version33.0
PCI Express lanes1616
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports16no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN4x10/2.5/1 GBEno data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Atom C3958 2.24
+131%
Celeron 4305UE 0.97

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Atom C3958 3929
+131%
Samples: 6
Celeron 4305UE 1699
Samples: 5

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.24 0.97
Recency 15 August 2017 1 October 2018
Physical cores 16 2
Threads 16 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 15 Watt

Atom C3958 has a 131% higher aggregate performance score, and 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

Celeron 4305UE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 107% lower power consumption.

The Intel Atom C3958 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron 4305UE in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom C3958 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron 4305UE is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 6 votes

Rate Atom C3958 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 4305UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom C3958 and Celeron 4305UE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.