Apple M2 Max vs Atom C3955

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom C3955
2017
16 cores / 16 threads, 32 Watt
3.62
Apple M2 Max
2023
12 cores / 12 threads, 79 Watt
16.68
+361%

Apple M2 Max outperforms Atom C3955 by a whopping 361% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3955 and M2 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1505396
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.89no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomApple M-Series
Power efficiency10.7820.12
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)no data
Release date15 August 2017 (7 years ago)17 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$434no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom C3955 and M2 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache896 KB3.3 MB
L2 cache16 MB36 MB
L3 cache16 MB48 MB
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Maximum core temperature78 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data67000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3955 and M2 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCBGA1310no data
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt79 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3955 and M2 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
QuickAssist-no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data

Security technologies

Atom C3955 and M2 Max technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3955 and M2 Max are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3955 and M2 Max. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2400no data
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M2 Max 38-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3955 and M2 Max.

PCIe version3no data
PCI Express lanes16no data
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports16no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports16no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN4x10/2.5/1 GBEno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom C3955 3.62
Apple M2 Max 16.68
+361%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom C3955 5803
Apple M2 Max 26710
+360%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.62 16.68
Recency 15 August 2017 17 January 2023
Physical cores 16 12
Threads 16 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 79 Watt

Atom C3955 has 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and 146.9% lower power consumption.

Apple M2 Max, on the other hand, has a 360.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The M2 Max is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom C3955 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom C3955 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M2 Max is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3955 and Apple M2 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3955
Atom C3955
Apple M2 Max
M2 Max

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3955 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 237 votes

Rate M2 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom C3955 or M2 Max, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.