Apple M2 Max vs Atom C3758

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom C3758
2017, $193
8 cores / 8 threads, 25 Watt
2.62
Apple M2 Max
2023
12 cores / 12 threads, 36 Watt
15.21
+481%

M2 Max outperforms Atom C3758 by a whopping 481% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1926521
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.54no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomApple M-Series
Power efficiency11.24no data
DesignerIntelApple
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)no data
Release date15 August 2017 (8 years ago)17 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$193no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Atom C3758 and M2 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads812
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache448 KB3.3 MB
L2 cache16 MB36 MB
L3 cache16 MB48 MB
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Maximum core temperature82 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data67000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3758 and M2 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCBGA1310no data
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt36 MB + 48 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3758 and M2 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
QuickAssist+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data

Security technologies

Atom C3758 and M2 Max technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3758 and M2 Max are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3758 and M2 Max. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2400no data
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M2 Max 38-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3758 and M2 Max.

PCIe version3no data
PCI Express lanes16no data
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports16no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN4x10/2.5/1 GBEno data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Atom C3758 2.62
Apple M2 Max 15.21
+481%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Atom C3758 4614
Samples: 7
Apple M2 Max 26822
+481%
Samples: 947

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.62 15.21
Recency 15 August 2017 17 January 2023
Physical cores 8 12
Threads 8 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 36 Watt

Atom C3758 has 44% lower power consumption.

Apple M2 Max, on the other hand, has a 480.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Apple M2 Max is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom C3758 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom C3758 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M2 Max is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3758
Atom C3758
Apple M2 Max
M2 Max

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 4 votes

Rate Atom C3758 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 253 votes

Rate M2 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom C3758 and M2 Max, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.