Celeron 3867U vs Atom C3950

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2864
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.06
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Celeron
Power efficiencyno data2.33
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Release date15 August 2017 (8 years ago)1 March 2019 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$389$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Atom C3950 and Celeron 3867U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed1.7 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus rateno data4 GT/s
Multiplier17no data
L1 cache896 KB128 KB
L2 cache16 MB512 KB
L3 cache16 MB2 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature78 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3950 and Celeron 3867U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1310FCBGA1356,FC-BGA1356
Power consumption (TDP)24 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3950 and Celeron 3867U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssist-no data
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Smart Responseno data+

Security technologies

Atom C3950 and Celeron 3867U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
MPX-+
SGX-Yes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3950 and Celeron 3867U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3950 and Celeron 3867U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2400DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size256 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s34.1 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 610
Max video memoryno data32 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data900 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom C3950 and Celeron 3867U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom C3950 and Celeron 3867U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Atom C3950 and Celeron 3867U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3950 and Celeron 3867U.

PCIe version33.0
PCI Express lanes1612
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports16no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN2x10/2.5/1 GBE + 2x1 GBEno data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2017 1 March 2019
Physical cores 16 2
Threads 16 2
Power consumption (TDP) 24 Watt 15 Watt

Atom C3950 has 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

Celeron 3867U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 60% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Intel Atom C3950 and Intel Celeron 3867U. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom C3950 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron 3867U is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 17 votes

Rate Atom C3950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 23 votes

Rate Celeron 3867U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom C3950 and Celeron 3867U, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.