Atom x7-Z8750 vs C3858

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom C3858
2017, $332
12 cores / 12 threads, 25 Watt
2.86
+292%

Atom C3858 outperforms Atom x7-Z8750 by a whopping 292% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18702892
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.37no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Atom7x Intel Atom
Power efficiency12.27no data
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Cherry Trail (2015−2016)
Release date15 August 2017 (8 years ago)1 April 2016 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$332$37

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Atom C3858 and Atom x7-Z8750 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads124
Base clock speed2 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz2.56 GHz
Multiplier2016
L1 cache672 KBno data
L2 cache12 MB2 MB
L3 cache12 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature83 °C90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3858 and Atom x7-Z8750 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1310UTFCBGA1380
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt2 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3858 and Atom x7-Z8750. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
QuickAssist+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Atom C3858 and Atom x7-Z8750 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Boot++
Identity Protection-+
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3858 and Atom x7-Z8750 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3858 and Atom x7-Z8750. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2400DDR3
Maximum memory size256 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell) (400 - 600 MHz)
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Graphics max frequencyno data600 MHz
Execution Unitsno data16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom C3858 and Atom x7-Z8750 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom C3858 and Atom x7-Z8750 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data3840x2160
Max resolution over eDPno data2560x1600

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3858 and Atom x7-Z8750.

PCIe version32.0
PCI Express lanes162
USB revision33.0
Total number of SATA ports16no data
Number of USB ports83
Integrated LAN4x10/2.5/1 GBEno data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Atom C3858 2.86
+292%
Atom x7-Z8750 0.73

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Atom C3858 5040
+289%
Samples: 3
Atom x7-Z8750 1294
Samples: 101

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.86 0.73
Recency 15 August 2017 1 April 2016
Physical cores 12 4
Threads 12 4
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 2 Watt

Atom C3858 has a 291.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

Atom x7-Z8750, on the other hand, has 1150% lower power consumption.

The Intel Atom C3858 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom x7-Z8750 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom C3858 is a server/workstation processor while Atom x7-Z8750 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3858
Atom C3858
Intel Atom x7-Z8750
Atom x7-Z8750

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Atom C3858 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 23 votes

Rate Atom x7-Z8750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom C3858 and Atom x7-Z8750, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.