Xeon D-1622 vs Atom C3538

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3538 and Xeon D-1622 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	2238	1350
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.05	2.47
Market segment	Server	Server
Series	Intel Atom	Intel Xeon D
Architecture codename	Goldmont (2016−2017)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date	15 August 2017 (6 years ago)	2 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$75	$170
Current price	$3784 (50.5x MSRP)	$1182 (7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon D-1622 has 4840% better value for money than Atom C3538.

Detailed specifications

Atom C3538 and Xeon D-1622 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	4	8
Base clock speed	2.1 GHz	2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.1 GHz	3.2 GHz
L1 cache	224 KB	256 KB
L2 cache	8 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	8 MB	6 MB
Chip lithography	14 nm	14 nm
Die size	no data	246.24 mm2
Maximum core temperature	87 °C	105 °C
Number of transistors	no data	3200 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3538 and Xeon D-1622 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCBGA1310	FCBGA1667
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	40 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3538 and Xeon D-1622. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	Intel® AVX2
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	no data	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
QuickAssist	+	-
Turbo Boost Technology	-	2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	+
TSX	no data	+
Idle States	no data	+
Thermal Monitoring	no data	+
GPIO	no data	+
AMT	no data	SPS 3.0
Status	Launched	Launched
Quiet System	no data	-

Security technologies

Atom C3538 and Xeon D-1622 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	no data	+
EDB	+	+
Secure Boot	+	no data
Secure Key	+	+
SGX	-	-
OS Guard	+	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3538 and Xeon D-1622 are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	+
VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3538 and Xeon D-1622. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4: 2133	DDR4, DDR3
Maximum memory size	256 GB	128 GB
Max memory channels	2	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	29.871 GB/s	34.124 GB/s
ECC memory support	+	+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3538 and Xeon D-1622.

PCIe version	3	2.0/3.0
PCI Express lanes	12	32
USB revision	3	2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA ports	12	6
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports	12	6
Number of USB ports	8	8
Integrated LAN	2x10/2.5/1 GBE + 2x2.5/1 GBE	-
UART	no data	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon D-1622 outperforms Atom C3538 by 229% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	1.22	4.01
Recency	15 August 2017	2 April 2019
Threads	4	8
Cost	$75	$170
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	40 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3538 and Xeon D-1622, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---