Xeon E-2436 vs Atom 330

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom 330 and Xeon E-2436 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated512
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data98.37
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiencyno data20.62
Architecture codenameDiamondville (2008−2009)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date2 April 2008 (16 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$43$331

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom 330 and Xeon E-2436 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz5 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate533.33 MT/s16 GT/s
Multiplier12no data
L1 cache112 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size51.9276 mm2163 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °C100 °C
Number of transistors94 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom 330 and Xeon E-2436 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketPBGA437FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom 330 and Xeon E-2436. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology-2
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Atom 330 and Xeon E-2436 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom 330 and Xeon E-2436 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom 330 and Xeon E-2436. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800
Maximum memory size8 GB128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom 330 and Xeon E-2436.

PCIe versionno data5
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom 330 363
Xeon E-2436 22487
+6095%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 2008 14 December 2023
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 4 12
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 65 Watt

Atom 330 has 712.5% lower power consumption.

Xeon E-2436, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Atom 330 and Xeon E-2436. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom 330 is a notebook processor while Xeon E-2436 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom 330 and Xeon E-2436, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom 330
Atom 330
Intel Xeon E-2436
Xeon E-2436

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 64 votes

Rate Atom 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon E-2436 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom 330 or Xeon E-2436, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.