Sempron 3500+ vs Atom 330

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom 330
2008
2 cores / 4 threads, 8 Watt
0.23
+53.3%
Sempron 3500+
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 62 Watt
0.15

Atom 330 outperforms Sempron 3500+ by an impressive 53% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom 330 and Sempron 3500+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31903327
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiency2.720.23
Architecture codenameDiamondville (2008−2009)Palermo (2001−2005)
Release date2 April 2008 (16 years ago)1 October 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$43$167

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom 330 and Sempron 3500+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed1.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz2 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate533.33 MT/sno data
Multiplier12no data
L1 cache112 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB256 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die size51.9276 mm2103 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Number of transistors94 Million63 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom 330 and Sempron 3500+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketPBGA437939
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt62 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom 330 and Sempron 3500+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Atom 330 and Sempron 3500+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom 330 and Sempron 3500+ are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom 330 and Sempron 3500+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1
Maximum memory size8 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom 330 0.23
+53.3%
Sempron 3500+ 0.15

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom 330 363
+56.5%
Sempron 3500+ 232

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.23 0.15
Recency 2 April 2008 1 October 2005
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 62 Watt

Atom 330 has a 53.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 675% lower power consumption.

The Atom 330 is our recommended choice as it beats the Sempron 3500+ in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom 330 is a notebook processor while Sempron 3500+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom 330 and Sempron 3500+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom 330
Atom 330
AMD Sempron 3500+
Sempron 3500+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 65 votes

Rate Atom 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 6 votes

Rate Sempron 3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom 330 or Sempron 3500+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.