Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U vs Atom 330

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom 330
2008, $43
2 cores / 4 threads, 8 Watt
0.22
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.09
+1759%

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U outperforms Atom 330 by a whopping 1759% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking34651556
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomAMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiencyno data29.30
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameDiamondville (2008−2009)Picasso (2019−2022)
Release date2 April 2008 (17 years ago)8 April 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$43no data

Detailed specifications

Atom 330 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeFSBPCIe 3.0
Bus rate533.33 MT/sno data
Multiplier1223
L1 cache112 KB128K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm12 nm
Die size51.9276 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Number of transistors94 Million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom 330 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPBGA437FP5
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom 330 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Atom 330 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom 330 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom 330 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size8 GB32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 ( - 1400 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom 330 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Atom 330 0.22
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U 4.09
+1759%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Atom 330 381
Samples: 194
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U 7219
+1795%
Samples: 412

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.22 4.09
Recency 2 April 2008 8 April 2019
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 45 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 15 Watt

Atom 330 has 87.5% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U, on the other hand, has a 1759.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom 330 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom 330
Atom 330
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 66 votes

Rate Atom 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 158 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom 330 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.