Pentium 4 505J vs Atom 330

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3420not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiency1.16no data
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameDiamondville (2008−2009)Prescott (2001−2005)
Release date2 April 2008 (17 years ago)December 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$43no data

Detailed specifications

Atom 330 and Pentium 4 505J basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed1.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz2.66 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate533.33 MT/sno data
Multiplier12no data
L1 cache112 KB16 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die size51.9276 mm2109 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Number of transistors94 Million125 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom 330 and Pentium 4 505J compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketPBGA437775
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt84 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom 330 and Pentium 4 505J. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Atom 330 and Pentium 4 505J technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom 330 and Pentium 4 505J are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom 330 and Pentium 4 505J. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GBno data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 84 Watt

Atom 330 has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 950% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Intel Atom 330 and Intel Pentium 4 505J. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom 330 is a notebook processor while Pentium 4 505J is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom 330
Atom 330
Intel Pentium 4 505J
Pentium 4 505J

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 66 votes

Rate Atom 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Pentium 4 505J on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom 330 and Pentium 4 505J, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.