Core i9-13900H vs Atom 330

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom 330 and Core i9-13900H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated285
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Raptor Lake-H
Architecture codenameDiamondville (2008−2009)Raptor Lake-H
Release date22 September 2008 (15 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$43no data
Current price$306 (7.1x MSRP)no data

Detailed specifications

Atom 330 and Core i9-13900H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads420
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz5.4 GHz
Bus support533 MHzno data
L1 cache112 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size52 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors94 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom 330 and Core i9-13900H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketPBGA437FCBGA1744
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom 330 and Core i9-13900H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSXno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPPno data+
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Atom 330 and Core i9-13900H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom 330 and Core i9-13900H are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom 330 and Core i9-13900H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GB96 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel® Iris® Xe Graphics eligible
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequency-1.5 GHz
Execution Units-96

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom 330 and Core i9-13900H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported-4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom 330 and Core i9-13900H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4-4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDP-4096 x 2304 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort-7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Atom 330 and Core i9-13900H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX-12.1
OpenGL-4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom 330 and Core i9-13900H.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data28

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Atom 330 363
i9-13900H 29049
+7902%

Core i9-13900H outperforms Atom 330 by 7902% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Atom 330 542
i9-13900H 9630
+1677%

Core i9-13900H outperforms Atom 330 by 1677% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Atom 330 1530
i9-13900H 56403
+3586%

Core i9-13900H outperforms Atom 330 by 3586% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Atom 330 825
i9-13900H 15120
+1734%

Core i9-13900H outperforms Atom 330 by 1734% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Atom 330 116.45
i9-13900H 3.14
+3609%

Atom 330 outperforms Core i9-13900H by 3609% in wPrime 32.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 September 2008 4 January 2023
Physical cores 2 14
Threads 4 20
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 45 Watt

We couldn't decide between Atom 330 and Core i9-13900H. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom 330 and Core i9-13900H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom 330
Atom 330
Intel Core i9-13900H
Core i9-13900H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 58 votes

Rate Atom 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 439 votes

Rate Core i9-13900H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom 330 or Core i9-13900H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.