Celeron J3355E vs Atom 330

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3465not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Atomno data
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameDiamondville (2008−2009)no data
Release date2 April 2008 (17 years ago)1 July 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$43no data

Detailed specifications

Atom 330 and Celeron J3355E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate533.33 MT/sno data
Multiplier12no data
L1 cache112 KBno data
L2 cache1 MBno data
L3 cache0 KB2 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size51.9276 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature85 °C105 °C
Number of transistors94 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom 330 and Celeron J3355E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketPBGA437no data
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom 330 and Celeron J3355E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Atom 330 and Celeron J3355E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom 330 and Celeron J3355E are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+
VT-ino data-
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom 330 and Celeron J3355E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel HD Graphics 500
Max video memory-8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video-+
Clear Video HD-+
Execution Units-12
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom 330 and Celeron J3355E integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported-3
eDP-+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Atom 330 and Celeron J3355E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX-+
OpenGL-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom 330 and Celeron J3355E.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 2008 1 July 2019
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 10 Watt

Atom 330 has 100% more threads, and 25% lower power consumption.

Celeron J3355E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Intel Atom 330 and Intel Celeron J3355E. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom 330 is a notebook processor while Celeron J3355E is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom 330
Atom 330
Intel Celeron J3355E
Celeron J3355E

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 66 votes

Rate Atom 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron J3355E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom 330 and Celeron J3355E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.