Celeron 900 vs Atom 330

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

Comparing Atom 330 and Celeron 900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Architecture codenameDiamondville (2008−2009)no data
Release date2 April 2008 (16 years ago)1 January 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$43no data

Detailed specifications

Atom 330 and Celeron 900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)no data
Threads4no data
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHzno data
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate533.33 MT/sno data
Multiplier12no data
L1 cache112 KBno data
L2 cache1 MBno data
L3 cache0 KB1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size51.9276 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature85 °C105 °C
Number of transistors94 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom 330 and Celeron 900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketPBGA437PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom 330 and Celeron 900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)--
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Atom 330 and Celeron 900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom 330 and Celeron 900 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x--

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom 330 and Celeron 900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory size8 GBno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom 330 363
Celeron 900 403
+11%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 2008 1 January 2009
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 35 Watt

Atom 330 has 337.5% lower power consumption.

Celeron 900, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months.

We couldn't decide between Atom 330 and Celeron 900. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom 330 and Celeron 900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom 330
Atom 330
Intel Celeron 900
Celeron 900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 60 votes

Rate Atom 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 50 votes

Rate Celeron 900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom 330 or Celeron 900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.