Ryzen 7 7840U vs Atom 230

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom 230 and Ryzen 7 7840U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated423
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiencyno data53.15
Architecture codenameSilverthorne (2008−2010)Phoenix-U (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date2 April 2008 (16 years ago)May 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$29no data

Detailed specifications

Atom 230 and Ryzen 7 7840U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate533.33 MT/sno data
Multiplier12no data
L1 cache56 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm4 nm
Die size25.9638 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °C100 °C
Number of transistors47 Million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom 230 and Ryzen 7 7840U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketPBGA437FP8
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom 230 and Ryzen 7 7840U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Atom 230 and Ryzen 7 7840U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom 230 and Ryzen 7 7840U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom 230 and Ryzen 7 7840U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-5600
Maximum memory size8 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom 230 and Ryzen 7 7840U.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom 230 169
Ryzen 7 7840U 24975
+14678%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Atom 230 557
Ryzen 7 7840U 6669
+1097%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Atom 230 851
Ryzen 7 7840U 38490
+4423%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 45 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 28 Watt

Atom 230 has 600% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 7840U, on the other hand, has 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom 230 and Ryzen 7 7840U. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom 230 and Ryzen 7 7840U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom 230
Atom 230
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
Ryzen 7 7840U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 56 votes

Rate Atom 230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 232 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7840U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom 230 or Ryzen 7 7840U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.