Atom Z670 vs 230

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom 230
2008, $29
1 core / 2 threads, 4 Watt
0.10
+11.1%

Atom 230 outperforms Atom Z670 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking37023709
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Atom
Power efficiency1.051.27
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameSilverthorne (2008−2010)Lincroft (2010−2011)
Release date2 April 2008 (18 years ago)11 April 2011 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$29$75

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Atom 230 and Atom Z670: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus typeFSBcDMI
Bus rate533.33 MT/s400 MT/s
Multiplier128
L1 cache56 KB56 KB
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size25.9638 mm265 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °C90 °C
Number of transistors47 Million140 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom 230 and Atom Z670 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPBGA437T-PBGA518
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt3 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom 230 and Atom Z670. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Atom 230 and Atom Z670 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom 230 and Atom Z670 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x--

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom 230 and Atom Z670. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2
Maximum memory size8 GB2.93 GB
Max memory channelsno data1
Maximum memory bandwidthno data3.2 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-PowerVR SGX535

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom 230 and Atom Z670 integrated GPUs.

LVDS-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom 230 and Atom Z670.

PCI supportno data-

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Atom 230 0.10
+11.1%
Atom Z670 0.09

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Atom 230 169
+7%
Samples: 61
Atom Z670 158
Samples: 4

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Atom 230 557
+12.1%
Atom Z670 497

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Atom 230 851
+12.1%
Atom Z670 759

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.10 0.09
Recency 2 April 2008 11 April 2011
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 3 Watt

Atom 230 has a 11% higher aggregate performance score.

Atom Z670, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and 33% lower power consumption.

The Intel Atom 230 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom Z670 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 67 votes

Rate Atom 230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.8 4 votes

Rate Atom Z670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom 230 and Atom Z670, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.