Atom Z670 vs N270

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom N270 and Atom Z670 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Atom
Architecture codenameDiamondVille (2008−2009)Lincroft (2010−2011)
Release date1 March 2008 (16 years ago)11 April 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$44$75
Current price$134 (3x MSRP)$900 (12x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

Atom N270 and Atom Z670 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus support533 MHz400 MT/s
L1 cache56 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size26 mm265 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C90 °C
Number of transistors47 Million140 million
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom N270 and Atom Z670 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPBGA437T-PBGA518
Power consumption (TDP)2.5 Watt3 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N270 and Atom Z670. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE, Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States-+
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Atom N270 and Atom Z670 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N270 and Atom Z670 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x--

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N270 and Atom Z670. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2
Maximum memory size8 GB2.93 GB
Max memory channelsno data1
Maximum memory bandwidthno data3.2 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-PowerVR SGX535

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom N270 and Atom Z670 integrated GPUs.

LVDS-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N270 and Atom Z670.

PCI supportno data-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Atom N270 136
Atom Z670 158
+16.2%

Z670 outperforms N270 by 16% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Atom N270 541
+8.9%
Atom Z670 497

N270 outperforms Z670 by 9% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Atom N270 830
+9.4%
Atom Z670 759

N270 outperforms Z670 by 9% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Atom N270 126
+19.8%
Atom Z670 151

Z670 outperforms N270 by 20% in wPrime 32.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2008 11 April 2011
Cost $44 $75
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 3 Watt

We couldn't decide between Atom N270 and Atom Z670. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N270 and Atom Z670, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N270
Atom N270
Intel Atom Z670
Atom Z670

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 216 votes

Rate Atom N270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Atom Z670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N270 or Atom Z670, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.