EPYC 9654P vs Athlon XP-M 3000+
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 19 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 2.21 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | no data | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | no data | 7.77 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Barton (2001−2004) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| Release date | January 2001 (24 years ago) | 10 November 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $10,625 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Athlon XP-M 3000+ and EPYC 9654P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 96 |
| Threads | 1 | 192 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 24 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 384 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Die size | 101 mm2 | 12x 72 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 63 million | 78,840 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon XP-M 3000+ and EPYC 9654P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | A | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 360 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon XP-M 3000+ and EPYC 9654P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon XP-M 3000+ and EPYC 9654P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon XP-M 3000+ and EPYC 9654P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5-4800 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 6 TiB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 460.8 GB/s |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon XP-M 3000+ and EPYC 9654P.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 96 |
| Threads | 1 | 192 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 360 Watt |
Athlon XP-M 3000+ has 700% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9654P, on the other hand, has 9500% more physical cores and 19100% more threads, and a 2500% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD Athlon XP-M 3000+ and AMD EPYC 9654P. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Athlon XP-M 3000+ is a notebook processor while EPYC 9654P is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
