Ultra 9 386H vs Athlon XP-M 3000+
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Barton (2001−2004) | no data |
| Release date | January 2001 (24 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Athlon XP-M 3000+ and Core Ultra 9 386H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | no data |
| Die size | 101 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 63 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon XP-M 3000+ and Core Ultra 9 386H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | A | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | + 18 MB |
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
