Ultra 9 386H vs Athlon XP-M 3000+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameBarton (2001−2004)Panther Lake
Release dateJanuary 2001 (25 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon XP-M 3000+ and Core Ultra 9 386H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Performance-coresno data4
Efficient-coresno data8
Low Power Efficient-coresno data4
Threads116
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KBno data
L3 cache0 KB18 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Chip lithography130 nmno data
Die size101 mm2no data
Number of transistors63 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon XP-M 3000+ and Core Ultra 9 386H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAFCBGA2540
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon XP-M 3000+ and Core Ultra 9 386H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Thermal Monitoring-+
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Athlon XP-M 3000+ and Core Ultra 9 386H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon XP-M 3000+ and Core Ultra 9 386H are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon XP-M 3000+ and Core Ultra 9 386H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataLPDDR5X-8533, DDR5-7200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data2.5 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon XP-M 3000+ and Core Ultra 9 386H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Athlon XP-M 3000+ and Core Ultra 9 386H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over eDPno data3840 x 2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Athlon XP-M 3000+ and Core Ultra 9 386H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX 12 Ultimate
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon XP-M 3000+ and Core Ultra 9 386H.

PCIe versionno data5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 16
Threads 1 16
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 25 Watt

Ultra 9 386H has 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and 80% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between AMD Athlon XP-M 3000+ and Intel Core Ultra 9 386H. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon XP-M 3000+
Athlon XP-M 3000+
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
Core Ultra 9 386H

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Athlon XP-M 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 9 386H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Athlon XP-M 3000+ and Core Ultra 9 386H, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.