Pentium 4 HT 640 vs Athlon XP 2500+

Primary details

Comparing Athlon XP 2500+ and Pentium 4 HT 640 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3312not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.21no data
Architecture codenameBarton (2001−2004)Prescott (2001−2005)
Release dateFebruary 2003 (21 year ago)February 2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon XP 2500+ and Pentium 4 HT 640 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads12
Boost clock speed1.83 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache128 KB28 KB
L2 cache512 KB2 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography130 nm90 nm
Die size101 mm2109 mm2
Number of transistors63 million169 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon XP 2500+ and Pentium 4 HT 640 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketA775
Power consumption (TDP)68 Watt84 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon XP 2500+ and Pentium 4 HT 640. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Pros & cons summary


Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 130 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 68 Watt 84 Watt

Athlon XP 2500+ has 23.5% lower power consumption.

Pentium 4 HT 640, on the other hand, has 100% more threads, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Athlon XP 2500+ and Pentium 4 HT 640. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon XP 2500+ and Pentium 4 HT 640, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon XP 2500+
Athlon XP 2500+
Intel Pentium 4 HT 640
Pentium 4 HT 640

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 34 votes

Rate Athlon XP 2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 54 votes

Rate Pentium 4 HT 640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon XP 2500+ or Pentium 4 HT 640, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.