A4-5300 vs Athlon X4 860K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon X4 860K
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
2.21
+151%

Athlon X4 860K outperforms A4-5300 by a whopping 151% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X4 860K and A4-5300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking17442439
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.490.06
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series (Desktop)
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date12 August 2014 (9 years ago)2 October 2012 (11 years ago)
Current price$112 $49

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon X4 860K has 717% better value for money than A4-5300.

Detailed specifications

Athlon X4 860K and A4-5300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.7 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cache256K128K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size245 mm2246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C70 °C
Number of transistors2,411 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X4 860K and A4-5300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+FM2
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X4 860K and A4-5300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataDDR3-1600 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, XOP, FMA3, FMA4
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X4 860K and A4-5300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X4 860K and A4-5300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 7480D

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X4 860K and A4-5300.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon X4 860K 2.21
+151%
A4-5300 0.88

Athlon X4 860K outperforms A4-5300 by 151% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Athlon X4 860K 3424
+151%
A4-5300 1364

Athlon X4 860K outperforms A4-5300 by 151% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Athlon X4 860K 465
+29.5%
A4-5300 359

Athlon X4 860K outperforms A4-5300 by 30% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Athlon X4 860K 1153
+128%
A4-5300 505

Athlon X4 860K outperforms A4-5300 by 128% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.21 0.88
Recency 12 August 2014 2 October 2012
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

The Athlon X4 860K is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-5300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X4 860K and A4-5300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X4 860K
Athlon X4 860K
AMD A4-5300
A4-5300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 233 votes

Rate Athlon X4 860K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 217 votes

Rate A4-5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X4 860K or A4-5300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.