FX-4320 vs Athlon X4 845

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon X4 845
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.45
+21.9%

Athlon X4 845 outperforms FX-4320 by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X4 845 and FX-4320 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking16811838
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.384.00
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date2 February 2016 (8 years ago)23 October 2012 (11 years ago)
Current price$50 $53

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

FX-4320 has 190% better value for money than Athlon X4 845.

Detailed specifications

Athlon X4 845 and FX-4320 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.5 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache320K192 KB
L2 cache2 MB4096 KB
L3 cacheno data4096 KB
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size250 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data71 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,100 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X4 845 and FX-4320 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X4 845 and FX-4320. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X4 845 and FX-4320 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X4 845 and FX-4320. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR3-1866

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X4 845 and FX-4320.

PCIe version3.0Not Listed
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon X4 845 2.45
+21.9%
FX-4320 2.01

Athlon X4 845 outperforms FX-4320 by 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Athlon X4 845 3797
+21.9%
FX-4320 3114

Athlon X4 845 outperforms FX-4320 by 22% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.45 2.01
Recency 2 February 2016 23 October 2012
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

The Athlon X4 845 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-4320 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X4 845 and FX-4320, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X4 845
Athlon X4 845
AMD FX-4320
FX-4320

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 78 votes

Rate Athlon X4 845 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 131 vote

Rate FX-4320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X4 845 or FX-4320, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.