Core 2 Quad Q9550 vs Athlon X4 840

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Athlon X4 840
2014
4 cores / 4 threads
2.15
+42.4%

Athlon X4 840 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9550 by a considerable 42% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X4 840 and Core 2 Quad Q9550 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking17582029
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.382.80
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Series4x AthlonCore 2 Quad (Desktop)
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Yorkfield (2007−2009)
Release dateAugust 2014 (9 years ago)no data
Current price$23 $54

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon X4 840 has 164% better value for money than Core 2 Quad Q9550.

Detailed specifications

Athlon X4 840 and Core 2 Quad Q9550 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2.83 GHz
Bus supportno data1333 MHz
L1 cache256Kno data
L2 cache4 MB12288 KB
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die size245 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,411 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X4 840 and Core 2 Quad Q9550 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketSocket FM2+LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)65 watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X4 840 and Core 2 Quad Q9550. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X4 840 and Core 2 Quad Q9550 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X4 840 and Core 2 Quad Q9550. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1,DDR2,DDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X4 840 and Core 2 Quad Q9550.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon X4 840 2.15
+42.4%
Core 2 Quad Q9550 1.51

Athlon X4 840 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9550 by 42% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Athlon X4 840 3319
+41.8%
Core 2 Quad Q9550 2340

Athlon X4 840 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9550 by 42% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Athlon X4 840 452
+22.8%
Core 2 Quad Q9550 368

Athlon X4 840 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9550 by 23% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Athlon X4 840 1135
+8.6%
Core 2 Quad Q9550 1045

Athlon X4 840 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9550 by 9% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.15 1.51
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

The Athlon X4 840 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Quad Q9550 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X4 840 and Core 2 Quad Q9550, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X4 840
Athlon X4 840
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
Core 2 Quad Q9550

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 567 votes

Rate Athlon X4 840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1808 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X4 840 or Core 2 Quad Q9550, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.