Celeron N6211 vs Athlon X4 840

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon X4 840
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.09
+48.2%
Celeron N6211
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.41

Athlon X4 840 outperforms Celeron N6211 by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X4 840 and Celeron N6211 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18742198
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.33
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Series4x AthlonElkhart Lake
Power efficiency3.0420.53
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Elkhart Lake (2022)
Release dateAugust 2014 (10 years ago)17 July 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$54

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon X4 840 and Celeron N6211 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.1 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache256Kno data
L2 cache4 MB1.5 MB
Chip lithography28 nm10 nm
Die size245 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data70 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,411 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X4 840 and Celeron N6211 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketSocket FM2+BGA1493
Power consumption (TDP)65 watt6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X4 840 and Celeron N6211. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X4 840 and Celeron N6211 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X4 840 and Celeron N6211. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (250 - 750 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X4 840 and Celeron N6211.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon X4 840 2.09
+48.2%
Celeron N6211 1.41

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon X4 840 3325
+48.1%
Celeron N6211 2245

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.09 1.41
Recency on August 2014 17 July 2022
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 6 Watt

Athlon X4 840 has a 48.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Celeron N6211, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 983.3% lower power consumption.

The Athlon X4 840 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N6211 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X4 840 and Celeron N6211, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X4 840
Athlon X4 840
Intel Celeron N6211
Celeron N6211

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 621 vote

Rate Athlon X4 840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 4 votes

Rate Celeron N6211 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X4 840 or Celeron N6211, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.