A6-3430MX vs Athlon X4 840

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon X4 840
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.15
+129%

Athlon X4 840 outperforms A6-3430MX by a whopping 129% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X4 840 and A6-3430MX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking17792415
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.38no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Series4x AthlonAMD A-Series
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Llano (2011−2012)
Release dateAugust 2014 (9 years ago)20 December 2011 (12 years ago)
Current price$23 $15.29

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon X4 840 and A6-3430MX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.1 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache256K128K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size245 mm2228 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,411 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X4 840 and A6-3430MX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSocket FM2+FS1
Power consumption (TDP)65 watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X4 840 and A6-3430MX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480G, DDR3(L)-1333 Memory Controller
AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X4 840 and A6-3430MX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X4 840 and A6-3430MX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6520G

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X4 840 and A6-3430MX.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon X4 840 2.15
+129%
A6-3430MX 0.94

Athlon X4 840 outperforms A6-3430MX by 129% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Athlon X4 840 3319
+129%
A6-3430MX 1448

Athlon X4 840 outperforms A6-3430MX by 129% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Athlon X4 840 455
+79.1%
A6-3430MX 254

Athlon X4 840 outperforms A6-3430MX by 79% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Athlon X4 840 1142
+67.7%
A6-3430MX 681

Athlon X4 840 outperforms A6-3430MX by 68% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.15 0.94
Recency on August 2014 20 December 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 45 Watt

The Athlon X4 840 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-3430MX in performance tests.

Note that Athlon X4 840 is a desktop processor while A6-3430MX is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X4 840 and A6-3430MX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X4 840
Athlon X4 840
AMD A6-3430MX
A6-3430MX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 573 votes

Rate Athlon X4 840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 39 votes

Rate A6-3430MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X4 840 or A6-3430MX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.