Mobile Sempron SI-40 vs Athlon X2 QL-65

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X2 QL-65 and Mobile Sempron SI-40 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD AthlonAMD Mobile Sempron
Architecture codenameLion (2008−2009)Sable (2008−2009)
Release date1 September 2009 (15 years ago)4 July 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon X2 QL-65 and Mobile Sempron SI-40 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHz1800 MHz
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X2 QL-65 and Mobile Sempron SI-40 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketS1g2S1g2
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X2 QL-65 and Mobile Sempron SI-40. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions65 nm, 1.075 - 1.12565 nm, 1.075 - 1.125V
PowerNow+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X2 QL-65 and Mobile Sempron SI-40 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Athlon X2 QL-65 1489
+92.9%
Mobile Sempron SI-40 772

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2009 4 July 2008
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 25 Watt

Athlon X2 QL-65 has an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Mobile Sempron SI-40, on the other hand, has 40% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon X2 QL-65 and Mobile Sempron SI-40. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X2 QL-65 and Mobile Sempron SI-40, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X2 QL-65
Athlon X2 QL-65
AMD Mobile Sempron SI-40
Mobile Sempron SI-40

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.4 127 votes

Rate Athlon X2 QL-65 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 35 votes

Rate Mobile Sempron SI-40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X2 QL-65 or Mobile Sempron SI-40, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.