Atom x7405C vs Athlon X2 QL-65

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X2 QL-65 and Atom x7405C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD Athlonno data
Architecture codenameLion (2008−2009)Amston Lake
Release date1 September 2009 (14 years ago)8 April 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon X2 QL-65 and Atom x7405C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus support3600 MHzno data
L1 cache256 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X2 QL-65 and Atom x7405C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketS1g2Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt12 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X2 QL-65 and Atom x7405C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions65 nm, 1.075 - 1.125no data
AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
PowerNow+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X2 QL-65 and Atom x7405C are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X2 QL-65 and Atom x7405C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X2 QL-65 and Atom x7405C.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2009 8 April 2024
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 65 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 12 Watt

Atom x7405C has an age advantage of 14 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 550% more advanced lithography process, and 191.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon X2 QL-65 and Atom x7405C. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X2 QL-65 and Atom x7405C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X2 QL-65
Athlon X2 QL-65
Intel Atom x7405C
Atom x7405C

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.4 127 votes

Rate Athlon X2 QL-65 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom x7405C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X2 QL-65 or Atom x7405C, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.