Ryzen AI 9 365 vs Athlon X2 340

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon X2 340
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.76
Ryzen AI 9 365
2024
10 cores / 20 threads, 28 Watt
17.12
+2153%

Ryzen AI 9 365 outperforms Athlon X2 340 by a whopping 2153% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2874429
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency1.2665.70
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesTSMC
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Strix Point (2024−2025)
Release date2 October 2012 (13 years ago)July 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon X2 340 and Ryzen AI 9 365 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads220
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache96K80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (shared)1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size246 mm2233 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,303 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X2 340 and Ryzen AI 9 365 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2FP8
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X2 340 and Ryzen AI 9 365. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X2 340 and Ryzen AI 9 365 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X2 340 and Ryzen AI 9 365. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 880M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X2 340 and Ryzen AI 9 365.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Athlon X2 340 0.76
Ryzen AI 9 365 17.12
+2153%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Athlon X2 340 1334
Samples: 55
Ryzen AI 9 365 30245
+2167%
Samples: 594

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon X2 340 333
Ryzen AI 9 365 2494
+649%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon X2 340 448
Ryzen AI 9 365 12475
+2685%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.76 17.12
Physical cores 2 10
Threads 2 20
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen AI 9 365 has a 2152.6% higher aggregate performance score, 400% more physical cores and 900% more threads, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 132.1% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon X2 340 in performance tests.

Note that Athlon X2 340 is a desktop processor while Ryzen AI 9 365 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X2 340
Athlon X2 340
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
Ryzen AI 9 365

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 41 votes

Rate Athlon X2 340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 209 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 365 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Athlon X2 340 and Ryzen AI 9 365, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.