3 305 vs Athlon X2 340
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2915 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 0.49 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Trinity (2012−2013) | Wildcat Lake (2026) |
| Release date | 2 October 2012 (13 years ago) | 16 April 2026 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $309 |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Athlon X2 340 and Core 3 305: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 6 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96K | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (shared) | 2.5 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 3 nm |
| Die size | 246 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,303 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon X2 340 and Core 3 305 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FM2 | Intel BGA 1516 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X2 340 and Core 3 305. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
Athlon X2 340 and Core 3 305 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X2 340 and Core 3 305 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X2 340 and Core 3 305. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1600 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel Xe3 Graphics (1 Xe) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X2 340 and Core 3 305.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 6 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 2 October 2012 | 16 April 2026 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 6 |
| Threads | 2 | 6 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Core 3 305 has an age advantage of 13 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 967% more advanced lithography process, and 333% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Athlon X2 340 and Intel Core 3 305. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon X2 340 is a desktop processor while Core 3 305 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
