Sempron 3200+ vs Athlon PRO 300GE
Primary details
Comparing Athlon PRO 300GE and Sempron 3200+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1671 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Athlon | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Palermo (2001−2005) |
| Release date | 30 September 2019 (4 years ago) | 1 October 2005 (18 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $13 |
Detailed specifications
Athlon PRO 300GE and Sempron 3200+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Multiplier | 34 | no data |
| L1 cache | 192 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 209.78 mm2 | 103 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 4950 Million | 63 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon PRO 300GE and Sempron 3200+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | Socket AM4 | 939 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 62 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon PRO 300GE and Sempron 3200+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon PRO 300GE and Sempron 3200+ are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon PRO 300GE and Sempron 3200+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR1 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 30 September 2019 | 1 October 2005 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 62 Watt |
Athlon PRO 300GE has an age advantage of 13 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 650% more advanced lithography process, and 77.1% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon PRO 300GE and Sempron 3200+. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon PRO 300GE and Sempron 3200+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
