A8-4500M vs Athlon PRO 300GE

Aggregate performance score

Athlon PRO 300GE
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.71
+156%
A8-4500M
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.06

Athlon PRO 300GE outperforms A8-4500M by a whopping 156% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon PRO 300GE and A8-4500M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17102433
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD AthlonAMD A-Series
Power efficiency7.322.86
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date30 September 2019 (5 years ago)15 May 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon PRO 300GE and A8-4500M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speedno data1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz2.8 GHz
Multiplier34no data
L1 cache192 KB192 KB
L2 cache1 MB4 MB (shared)
L3 cache4 MB0 KB
Chip lithography12 nm32 nm
Die size209.78 mm2246 mm2
Number of transistors4950 Million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon PRO 300GE and A8-4500M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSocket AM4FS1r2
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon PRO 300GE and A8-4500M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon PRO 300GE and A8-4500M are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon PRO 300GE and A8-4500M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666unknown
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon Vega 3AMD Radeon HD 7640G (496 - 685 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon PRO 300GE 2.71
+156%
A8-4500M 1.06

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon PRO 300GE 4308
+156%
A8-4500M 1685

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon PRO 300GE 937
+222%
A8-4500M 291

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon PRO 300GE 1911
+193%
A8-4500M 652

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.71 1.06
Integrated graphics card 2.98 1.19
Recency 30 September 2019 15 May 2012
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 12 nm 32 nm

Athlon PRO 300GE has a 155.7% higher aggregate performance score, 150.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.

A8-4500M, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores.

The Athlon PRO 300GE is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-4500M in performance tests.

Note that Athlon PRO 300GE is a desktop processor while A8-4500M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon PRO 300GE and A8-4500M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon PRO 300GE
Athlon PRO 300GE
AMD A8-4500M
A8-4500M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 116 votes

Rate Athlon PRO 300GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 321 vote

Rate A8-4500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon PRO 300GE or A8-4500M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.