A10-4655M vs Athlon PRO 300GE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon PRO 300GE
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.46
+162%

Athlon PRO 300GE outperforms A10-4655M by a whopping 162% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19672728
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD AthlonAMD A-Series
Power efficiency7.544.03
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date30 September 2019 (6 years ago)15 May 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon PRO 300GE and A10-4655M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz2.8 GHz
Multiplier34no data
L1 cache192 KB192 KB
L2 cache1 MB4 MB (shared)
L3 cache4 MB0 KB
Chip lithography12 nm32 nm
Die size209.78 mm2246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data100 °C
Number of transistors4950 Million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon PRO 300GE and A10-4655M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSocket AM4FP2
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon PRO 300GE and A10-4655M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon PRO 300GE and A10-4655M are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon PRO 300GE and A10-4655M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666unknown Dual-channel
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon Vega 3AMD Radeon HD 7620G (360 - 497 MHz)

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Athlon PRO 300GE 2.46
+162%
A10-4655M 0.94

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Athlon PRO 300GE 4342
+163%
Samples: 49
A10-4655M 1654
Samples: 171

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon PRO 300GE 921
+235%
A10-4655M 275

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon PRO 300GE 1861
+212%
A10-4655M 596

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.46 0.94
Integrated graphics card 2.75 0.85
Recency 30 September 2019 15 May 2012
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 12 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 25 Watt

Athlon PRO 300GE has a 161.7% higher aggregate performance score, 223.5% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.

A10-4655M, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores, and 40% lower power consumption.

The AMD Athlon PRO 300GE is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A10-4655M in performance tests.

Note that Athlon PRO 300GE is a desktop processor while A10-4655M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon PRO 300GE
Athlon PRO 300GE
AMD A10-4655M
A10-4655M

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 129 votes

Rate Athlon PRO 300GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 68 votes

Rate A10-4655M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Athlon PRO 300GE and A10-4655M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.