Xeon W-3275 vs Athlon Neo MV-40

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon Neo MV-40
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 512 Watt
0.16
Xeon W-3275
2019, $4,449
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
23.40
+14525%

Xeon W-3275 outperforms Athlon Neo MV-40 by a whopping 14525% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3551273
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.89
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Athlon NeoIntel Xeon W
Power efficiencyno data12.24
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameHuron (2009)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date6 January 2009 (16 years ago)3 June 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Athlon Neo MV-40 and Xeon W-3275 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads156
Base clock speedno data2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate1600 MHz4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data25
L1 cache128 KB1.75 MB
L2 cache512 KB28 MB
L3 cacheno data38.5 MB
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature95 °C76 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon Neo MV-40 and Xeon W-3275 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketASB1FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)512 KB205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Xeon W-3275. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, VirtualizationIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
VirusProtect+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Athlon Neo MV-40 and Xeon W-3275 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Xeon W-3275 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Xeon W-3275. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data1 TB
Max memory channelsno data6
Maximum memory bandwidthno data140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Xeon W-3275.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Athlon Neo MV-40 0.16
Xeon W-3275 23.40
+14525%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Athlon Neo MV-40 281
Samples: 82
Xeon W-3275 41267
+14586%
Samples: 9

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.16 23.40
Recency 6 January 2009 3 June 2019
Physical cores 1 28
Threads 1 56
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 512 Watt 205 Watt

Xeon W-3275 has a 14525% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 2700% more physical cores and 5500% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 149.8% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon W-3275 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon Neo MV-40 in performance tests.

Be aware that Athlon Neo MV-40 is a notebook processor while Xeon W-3275 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon Neo MV-40
Athlon Neo MV-40
Intel Xeon W-3275
Xeon W-3275

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 11 votes

Rate Athlon Neo MV-40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 6 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Athlon Neo MV-40 and Xeon W-3275, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.