Xeon Bronze 3204 vs Athlon Neo MV-40

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon Neo MV-40
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 15 Watt
0.16
Xeon Bronze 3204
2019
6 cores / 6 threads, 85 Watt
2.71
+1594%

Xeon Bronze 3204 outperforms Athlon Neo MV-40 by a whopping 1594% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking35341883
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.71
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Athlon NeoIntel Xeon Bronze
Power efficiency0.451.36
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameHuron (2009)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date6 January 2009 (16 years ago)2 April 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$213

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Athlon Neo MV-40 and Xeon Bronze 3204 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads16
Base clock speedno data1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.9 GHz
Bus rate1600 MHzno data
Multiplierno data19
L1 cache128 KB384 KB
L2 cache512 KB6 MB
L3 cacheno data8.25 MB
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature95 °C77 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon Neo MV-40 and Xeon Bronze 3204 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketASB1FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt85 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Xeon Bronze 3204. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, VirtualizationIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
VirusProtect+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Athlon Neo MV-40 and Xeon Bronze 3204 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Xeon Bronze 3204 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Xeon Bronze 3204. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-2133
Maximum memory sizeno data1 TB
Max memory channelsno data6
Maximum memory bandwidthno data102.403 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Xeon Bronze 3204.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Athlon Neo MV-40 0.16
Xeon Bronze 3204 2.71
+1594%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Athlon Neo MV-40 281
Samples: 82
Xeon Bronze 3204 4797
+1607%
Samples: 14

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.16 2.71
Recency 6 January 2009 2 April 2019
Physical cores 1 6
Threads 1 6
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 85 Watt

Athlon Neo MV-40 has 466.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon Bronze 3204, on the other hand, has a 1593.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Xeon Bronze 3204 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon Neo MV-40 in performance tests.

Be aware that Athlon Neo MV-40 is a notebook processor while Xeon Bronze 3204 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon Neo MV-40
Athlon Neo MV-40
Intel Xeon Bronze 3204
Xeon Bronze 3204

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 11 votes

Rate Athlon Neo MV-40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 23 votes

Rate Xeon Bronze 3204 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Athlon Neo MV-40 and Xeon Bronze 3204, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.