V-Series V160 vs Athlon Neo MV-40

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon Neo MV-40 and V-Series V160 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3275not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Athlon NeoAMD V-Series
Power efficiency1.07no data
Architecture codenameHuron (2009)Champlain (2010−2011)
Release date6 January 2009 (15 years ago)1 December 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon Neo MV-40 and V-Series V160 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate1600 MHz3200 MHz
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon Neo MV-40 and V-Series V160 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketASB1S1
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and V-Series V160. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, VirtualizationMMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization
VirusProtect++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and V-Series V160 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and V-Series V160. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2009 1 December 2010
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 25 Watt

Athlon Neo MV-40 has 66.7% lower power consumption.

V-Series V160, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Athlon Neo MV-40 and V-Series V160. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon Neo MV-40 and V-Series V160, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon Neo MV-40
Athlon Neo MV-40
AMD V-Series V160
V-Series V160

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 11 votes

Rate Athlon Neo MV-40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 17 votes

Rate V-Series V160 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon Neo MV-40 or V-Series V160, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.