Ryzen 5 7535HS vs Athlon Neo MV-40

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon Neo MV-40 and Ryzen 5 7535HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated647
Place by popularitynot in top-10025
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Athlon Neono data
Architecture codenameHuron (2009)Rembrandt R (2023)
Release date6 January 2009 (15 years ago)5 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon Neo MV-40 and Ryzen 5 7535HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads112
Base clock speedno data3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz4.55 GHz
Bus rate1600 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB384 KB
L2 cache512 KB3 MB
L3 cacheno data16 MB
Chip lithography65 nm6 nm
Die sizeno data208 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon Neo MV-40 and Ryzen 5 7535HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketASB1FP7
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Ryzen 5 7535HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, VirtualizationXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
VirusProtect+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Ryzen 5 7535HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Ryzen 5 7535HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 660M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Ryzen 5 7535HS.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon Neo MV-40 275
Ryzen 5 7535HS 18459
+6612%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Athlon Neo MV-40 1274
Ryzen 5 7535HS 6257
+391%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Athlon Neo MV-40 1149
Ryzen 5 7535HS 37321
+3150%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Athlon Neo MV-40 614
Ryzen 5 7535HS 12242
+1894%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Athlon Neo MV-40 102
Ryzen 5 7535HS 8.4
+1114%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Athlon Neo MV-40 0
Ryzen 5 7535HS 20
+6003%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Athlon Neo MV-40 0.1
Ryzen 5 7535HS 10.2
+16900%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Athlon Neo MV-40 332
Ryzen 5 7535HS 6586
+1884%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Athlon Neo MV-40 2
Ryzen 5 7535HS 104
+5196%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Athlon Neo MV-40 12
Ryzen 5 7535HS 258
+2125%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2009 5 January 2023
Physical cores 1 6
Threads 1 12
Chip lithography 65 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

Athlon Neo MV-40 has 133.3% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 7535HS, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 983.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Athlon Neo MV-40 and Ryzen 5 7535HS. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon Neo MV-40 and Ryzen 5 7535HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon Neo MV-40
Athlon Neo MV-40
AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS
Ryzen 5 7535HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 11 votes

Rate Athlon Neo MV-40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1180 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7535HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon Neo MV-40 or Ryzen 5 7535HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.