Celeron M ULV 523 vs Athlon Neo MV-40

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

Comparing Athlon Neo MV-40 and Celeron M ULV 523 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Athlon Neono data
Architecture codenameHuron (2009)no data
Release date6 January 2009 (15 years ago)1 July 2007 (17 years ago)
Current price$85 no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon Neo MV-40 and Celeron M ULV 523 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)no data
Threads1no data
Boost clock speed1.6 GHzno data
Bus support1600 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KBno data
Chip lithography65 nmno data
Maximum core temperature95 °C100 °C
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Athlon Neo MV-40 and Celeron M ULV 523 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketASB1no data
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt5.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Celeron M ULV 523. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualizationno data
VirusProtect+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Celeron M ULV 523 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2009 1 July 2007
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 5 Watt

Athlon Neo MV-40 has an age advantage of 1 year.

Celeron M ULV 523, on the other hand, has 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon Neo MV-40 and Celeron M ULV 523. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon Neo MV-40 and Celeron M ULV 523, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon Neo MV-40
Athlon Neo MV-40
Intel Celeron M ULV 523
Celeron M ULV 523

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 11 votes

Rate Athlon Neo MV-40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron M ULV 523 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon Neo MV-40 or Celeron M ULV 523, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.