3015e vs Athlon Neo MV-40

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon Neo MV-40
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 15 Watt
0.17
3015e
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.71
+906%

3015e outperforms Athlon Neo MV-40 by a whopping 906% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon Neo MV-40 and 3015e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32602042
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Athlon NeoAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Power efficiency1.0726.97
Architecture codenameHuron (2009)Pollock (Zen) (2020)
Release date6 January 2009 (15 years ago)4 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon Neo MV-40 and 3015e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads14
Base clock speedno data1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus rate1600 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB192 KB
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
L3 cacheno data4 MB
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature95 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon Neo MV-40 and 3015e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketASB1FT5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and 3015e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, VirtualizationMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and 3015e are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and 3015e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 600 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon Neo MV-40 0.17
3015e 1.71
+906%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon Neo MV-40 275
3015e 2712
+886%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.17 1.71
Recency 6 January 2009 4 August 2020
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 6 Watt

3015e has a 905.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

The 3015e is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon Neo MV-40 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon Neo MV-40 and 3015e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon Neo MV-40
Athlon Neo MV-40
AMD 3015e
3015e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 11 votes

Rate Athlon Neo MV-40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 29 votes

Rate 3015e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon Neo MV-40 or 3015e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.