Apple M1 Pro 8-Core vs Athlon MP 2800+
Aggregate performance score
M1 Pro 8-Core outperforms Athlon MP 2800+ by a whopping 5074% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3549 | 952 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Athlon MP | Apple M-Series |
| Power efficiency | 0.13 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Apple |
| Architecture codename | K7 (2000−2004) | no data |
| Release date | 6 May 2003 (23 years ago) | 18 October 2021 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $275 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Athlon MP 2800+ and M1 Pro 8-Core: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.06 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 3.22 GHz |
| Bus type | FSB | no data |
| Bus rate | 266 MT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 16 | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 2.3 MB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 28 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 101 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 54 Million | 33700 Million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon MP 2800+ and M1 Pro 8-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | W |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon MP 2800+ and M1 Pro 8-Core. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU ( - 1296 MHz) |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.19 | 9.83 |
| Recency | 6 May 2003 | 18 October 2021 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 5 nm |
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core has a 5074% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 18 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 2500% more advanced lithography process.
The Apple M1 Pro 8-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon MP 2800+ in performance tests.
Be aware that Athlon MP 2800+ is a server/workstation processor while Apple M1 Pro 8-Core is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
