Atom C3308 vs Athlon MP 2400+
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3575 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | AMD Athlon MP | Intel Atom |
| Power efficiency | 0.11 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | K7 (2000−2004) | Goldmont (2016−2017) |
| Release date | 10 December 2002 (23 years ago) | 15 August 2017 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $228 | $32 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Athlon MP 2400+ and Atom C3308 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Bus type | FSB | no data |
| Bus rate | 266 MT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 15 | 16 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 112 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 85 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 89 °C |
| Number of transistors | 37 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon MP 2400+ and Atom C3308 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | no data | FCBGA1310 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 9.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon MP 2400+ and Atom C3308. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| QuickAssist | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
Security technologies
Athlon MP 2400+ and Atom C3308 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Boot | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | - |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon MP 2400+ and Atom C3308 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon MP 2400+ and Atom C3308. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4: 1866 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 14.936 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon MP 2400+ and Atom C3308.
| PCIe version | no data | 3 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 6 |
| USB revision | no data | 3 |
| Total number of SATA ports | no data | 6 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 8 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | 4x2.5/1 GBE |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 10 December 2002 | 15 August 2017 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 9 Watt |
Atom C3308 has an age advantage of 14 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 828.6% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Athlon MP 2400+ and Intel Atom C3308. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
