Intel Celeron G3900T vs AMD Athlon II X4 641

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

Athlon II X4 641
1.51
+10.2%

Athlon II X4 641 outperforms Celeron G3900T by 10% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Athlon II X4 641 and Celeron G3900T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking20152099
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.150.84
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date6 February 2012 (12 years old)19 October 2015 (8 years old)
Current price$19.92 $69
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron G3900T has 460% better value for money than Athlon II X4 641.

Technical specs

Athlon II X4 641 and Celeron G3900T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus supportno data4 × 8 GT/s
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size228 mm298.57 mm210.3 mm × 9.57 mm
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X4 641 and Celeron G3900T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM1FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II X4 641 and Celeron G3900T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
TSXno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
SIPPno data-
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

Athlon II X4 641 and Celeron G3900T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPXno data-
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X4 641 and Celeron G3900T are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X4 641 and Celeron G3900T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.1 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 510
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Videono data+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data950 MHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon II X4 641 and Celeron G3900T integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Athlon II X4 641 and Celeron G3900T integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAno dataN/A

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Athlon II X4 641 and Celeron G3900T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X4 641 and Celeron G3900T.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon II X4 641 1.51
+10.2%
Celeron G3900T 1.37

Athlon II X4 641 outperforms Celeron G3900T by 10% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Athlon II X4 641 2313
+10%
Celeron G3900T 2102

Athlon II X4 641 outperforms Celeron G3900T by 10% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Athlon II X4 641 374
Celeron G3900T 545
+45.7%

Celeron G3900T outperforms Athlon II X4 641 by 46% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Athlon II X4 641 1256
+32.6%
Celeron G3900T 947

Athlon II X4 641 outperforms Celeron G3900T by 33% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.51 1.37
Recency 6 February 2012 19 October 2015
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 35 Watt

The Athlon II X4 641 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G3900T in performance tests.

Be aware that Athlon II X4 641 is a desktop processor while Celeron G3900T is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X4 641 and Celeron G3900T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X4 641
Athlon II X4 641
Intel Celeron G3900T
Celeron G3900T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 137 votes

Rate AMD Athlon II X4 641 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 25 votes

Rate Intel Celeron G3900T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X4 641 or Celeron G3900T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.