Sempron 2800+ vs Athlon II X4 640

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II X4 640 and Sempron 2800+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2199not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.92no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.40no data
Architecture codenamePropus (2009−2011)Manila (2001−2006)
Release date11 May 2010 (14 years ago)January 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80$104

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X4 640 and Sempron 2800+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)256K
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm130 nm
Die size169 mm2144 mm2
Number of transistors300 million81 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X4 640 and Sempron 2800+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3AM2
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt62 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X4 640 and Sempron 2800+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X4 640 and Sempron 2800+.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon II X4 640 2245
+824%
Sempron 2800+ 243

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 62 Watt

Athlon II X4 640 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 188.9% more advanced lithography process.

Sempron 2800+, on the other hand, has 53.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon II X4 640 and Sempron 2800+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X4 640 and Sempron 2800+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X4 640
Athlon II X4 640
AMD Sempron 2800+
Sempron 2800+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 1368 votes

Rate Athlon II X4 640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 47 votes

Rate Sempron 2800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X4 640 or Sempron 2800+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.