Athlon II Neo K325 vs Athlon II X4 640

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II X4 640 and Athlon II Neo K325 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2195not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.92no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Athlon II Neo
Power efficiency1.41no data
Architecture codenamePropus (2009−2011)Geneva (2010)
Release date11 May 2010 (14 years ago)12 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X4 640 and Athlon II Neo K325 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus rateno data2000 MHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size169 mm2no data
Number of transistors300 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X4 640 and Athlon II Neo K325 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3S1
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt12 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II X4 640 and Athlon II Neo K325. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataSSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, PowerNow, HyperTransport 3.0
PowerNow-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X4 640 and Athlon II Neo K325 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X4 640 and Athlon II Neo K325. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X4 640 and Athlon II Neo K325.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon II X4 640 2245
+438%
Athlon II Neo K325 417

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon II X4 640 313
+98.1%
Athlon II Neo K325 158

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon II X4 640 951
+231%
Athlon II Neo K325 287

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 12 Watt

Athlon II X4 640 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Athlon II Neo K325, on the other hand, has 691.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon II X4 640 and Athlon II Neo K325. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon II X4 640 is a desktop processor while Athlon II Neo K325 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X4 640 and Athlon II Neo K325, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X4 640
Athlon II X4 640
AMD Athlon II Neo K325
Athlon II Neo K325

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 1359 votes

Rate Athlon II X4 640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 9 votes

Rate Athlon II Neo K325 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X4 640 or Athlon II Neo K325, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.