Xeon Platinum 8380 vs Athlon II X4 635

Aggregate performance score

Athlon II X4 635
2010
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.44
Xeon Platinum 8380
2021
40 cores / 80 threads, 270 Watt
40.29
+2698%

Xeon Platinum 8380 outperforms Athlon II X4 635 by a whopping 2698% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II X4 635 and Xeon Platinum 8380 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking210561
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.865.53
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenamePropus (2009−2011)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date25 January 2010 (14 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$70no data
Current price$29 (0.4x MSRP)$7839

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Platinum 8380 has 93% better value for money than Athlon II X4 635.

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X4 635 and Xeon Platinum 8380 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)40 (Tetraconta-Core)
Threads480
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB60 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
Die size169 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data83 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data83 °C
Number of transistors300 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X4 635 and Xeon Platinum 8380 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM3FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II X4 635 and Xeon Platinum 8380. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

Athlon II X4 635 and Xeon Platinum 8380 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X4 635 and Xeon Platinum 8380 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X4 635 and Xeon Platinum 8380. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory supportno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X4 635 and Xeon Platinum 8380.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon II X4 635 1.44
Xeon Platinum 8380 40.29
+2698%

Xeon Platinum 8380 outperforms Athlon II X4 635 by 2698% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Athlon II X4 635 2232
Xeon Platinum 8380 62318
+2692%

Xeon Platinum 8380 outperforms Athlon II X4 635 by 2692% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.44 40.29
Recency 25 January 2010 6 April 2021
Physical cores 4 40
Threads 4 80
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 270 Watt

The Xeon Platinum 8380 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X4 635 in performance tests.

Note that Athlon II X4 635 is a desktop processor while Xeon Platinum 8380 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X4 635 and Xeon Platinum 8380, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X4 635
Athlon II X4 635
Intel Xeon Platinum 8380
Xeon Platinum 8380

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 216 votes

Rate Athlon II X4 635 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 83 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X4 635 or Xeon Platinum 8380, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.