Core i3-5010U vs Athlon II X4 635

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon II X4 635
2010
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.45
+2.1%

Athlon II X4 635 outperforms i3-5010U by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II X4 635 and Core i3-5010U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking21502165
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.86no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core i3
Architecture codenamePropus (2009−2011)Broadwell (2014−2019)
Release date25 January 2010 (14 years ago)5 January 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$70$281

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X4 635 and Core i3-5010U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz2.1 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache0 KB3 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size169 mm282 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data105 °C
Number of transistors300 million1300 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X4 635 and Core i3-5010U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3BGA
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II X4 635 and Core i3-5010U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X4 635 and Core i3-5010U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X4 635 and Core i3-5010U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 5500

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X4 635 and Core i3-5010U.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon II X4 635 1.45
+2.1%
i3-5010U 1.42

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon II X4 635 2237
+2%
i3-5010U 2194

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon II X4 635 296
i3-5010U 649
+119%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon II X4 635 863
i3-5010U 1317
+52.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.45 1.42
Recency 25 January 2010 5 January 2015
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 15 Watt

Athlon II X4 635 has a 2.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores.

i3-5010U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Athlon II X4 635 and Core i3-5010U.

Note that Athlon II X4 635 is a desktop processor while Core i3-5010U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X4 635 and Core i3-5010U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X4 635
Athlon II X4 635
Intel Core i3-5010U
Core i3-5010U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 217 votes

Rate Athlon II X4 635 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 72 votes

Rate Core i3-5010U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X4 635 or Core i3-5010U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.