FX-8170 vs Athlon II X3 420e

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II X3 420e and FX-8170 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2472not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.05no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.06no data
Architecture codenameRana (2009−2011)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date21 September 2010 (14 years ago)23 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$116no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X3 420e and FX-8170 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores3 (Tri-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads38
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)384 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)8 MB
L3 cache0 KB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size169 mm2315 mm2
Number of transistors300 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X3 420e and FX-8170 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II X3 420e and FX-8170. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X3 420e and FX-8170 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X3 420e and FX-8170. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X3 420e and FX-8170.

PCIe version2.02.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 September 2010 23 October 2012
Physical cores 3 8
Threads 3 8
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 125 Watt

Athlon II X3 420e has 177.8% lower power consumption.

FX-8170, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Athlon II X3 420e and FX-8170. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X3 420e and FX-8170, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X3 420e
Athlon II X3 420e
AMD FX-8170
FX-8170

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 10 votes

Rate Athlon II X3 420e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 15 votes

Rate FX-8170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X3 420e or FX-8170, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.