EPYC 7763 vs Athlon II X3 405e
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7763 outperforms Athlon II X3 405e by a whopping 6234% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2813 | 46 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 4.58 | 3.57 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | no data | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | 0.71 | 7.27 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Rana (2009−2011) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| Release date | 20 October 2009 (15 years ago) | 15 March 2021 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $80 | $7,890 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Athlon II X3 405e has 28% better value for money than EPYC 7763.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Athlon II X3 405e and EPYC 7763 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 3 (Tri-Core) | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 3 | 128 |
| Base clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 2.45 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 24.5 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 256 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm+ |
| Die size | 169 mm2 | 8x 81 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 300 million | 33,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon II X3 405e and EPYC 7763 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | AM3 | SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 280 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II X3 405e and EPYC 7763. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X3 405e and EPYC 7763 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X3 405e and EPYC 7763. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TiB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 204.795 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X3 405e and EPYC 7763.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.76 | 48.14 |
| Recency | 20 October 2009 | 15 March 2021 |
| Physical cores | 3 | 64 |
| Threads | 3 | 128 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 280 Watt |
Athlon II X3 405e has 522.2% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7763, on the other hand, has a 6234.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 2033.3% more physical cores and 4166.7% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD EPYC 7763 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon II X3 405e in performance tests.
Note that Athlon II X3 405e is a desktop processor while EPYC 7763 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
